BENGHAZI DOT ONE, WHY THE VIDEO AND WHY AP
Originally posted Thursday, May 16, 2013 3:43:34 PM
BENGHAZI DOT ONE, WHY THE VIDEO AND WHY AP
This began as a response to a question posed by ‘just a hairy ape’ on a previous thread. To fully understand Benghazi, I have to go back and break this down into parts. There was more than one reason and we need to understand them all which isn’t easy,(and even less easy to explain,) because there are details long forgotten as if each ‘thing’ was in a box of its own separate from each other ‘thing’. In reality, they are connected in a myriad of ways. So this is going to have to be a series. Step by step. Inch by inch. Slowly we turn.
This was the question that started the response. He was alluding to obama’s speech at the UN where he continued to blame the video.
“So Obama was endorsing the terrorist attack against the US ?”
My response: “On a worldwide stage.”
I am going to repeat this since I have been reminding people to remember how the whole video thing started.
obama was, and had been, embroiled in yet another showdown with Netanyahu. IT WAS STAGED. The dustup was that he refused to meet with Bibi at the UN. Netanyahu had already beaten obama at his own game a multitude of times and it was well known that obama hated him.
Netanyahu was in the middle of Israeli elections and the obama admin had already sent people over to do everything they could to unseat Bibi as Israel’s PM. It wasn’t working…not even close.
Meanwhile, obama had been searching for a way to give the third and final edict that the US was/is a muslim country. He had already done it twice in muslim countries but never on our own soil. And NOW there is yet another damning twist in this horror story.
If you want the full meal deal, bookmark this because it’s only one of more to come.
Here are the mini-dots on DOT ONE.
The very first story out of the box is that the vid maker was an ‘anonymous’ Israeli Jewish billionaire.
But then. along came AP.
The anti-Muslim film implicated in mob protests against U.S. diplomatic missions in the Mideast received logistical help from a man once convicted of financial crimes and featured actors who complained that their inflammatory dialogue was dubbed in after filming.
The self-proclaimed director of “Innocence of Muslims” initially claimed a Jewish and Israeli background.
Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, 55, told The Associated Press in an interview outside Los Angeles Wednesday that he managed logistics for the company that produced “Innocence of Muslims,” which mocked Muslims and the prophet Muhammad.
The AP located Bacile after obtaining his cellphone number from Morris Sadek, a conservative Coptic Christian in the U.S. who had promoted the anti-Muslim film in recent days on his website. Egypt’s Christian Coptic populace has long decried what they describe as a history of discrimination and occasional violence from the country’s Arab majority.
Nakoula denied he had directed the film, though he said he knew the self-described filmmaker, Sam Bacile. But the cellphone number that the AP contacted Tuesday to reach the filmmaker who identified himself as Bacile traced to the same address near Los Angeles where Nakoula was located.
Nakoula told the AP he is a Coptic Christian and supported the concerns of Christian Copts about their treatment by Muslims.
As Walid Shoebat revealed however, not even that was a the truth, although the WH has never stopped claiming it. In fact, they ignored Shoebat’s revelation which laid out Nakoula’s entire background and exposed him as an FBI asset and a muslim.
Innocence of Muslims made by Terrorists
Shoebat ^ | 9/25/12 | Walid Shoebat
Posted on Tuesday, September 25, 2012 7:17:32 PM by Ben Barrack
There is more to the story of Nakoula Basseley Nakoula than what we are told by the media. Court documents reveal that Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, producer of the movie Innocence of Muslims, partnered in a scheme with Eiad Salameh, my first cousin, a Palestinian Muslim from Beit Sahour in the Palestinian district of Bethlehem.
NO ONE has followed up on Shoebat’s assertions. Why not?
BUT NOW YOU KNOW WHY DOJ WENT HARD AND FAST AFTER AP! Because only the PLANNERS knew the identity of the vid maker. So if AP found him, they concluded that someone very high up in the planning MUST have leaked it and they were damned frantically trying to find out who. In other words, they PANICKED, and holder recused himself because he is involved in this up to his shifty eyeballs. Nakoula was a DOJ asset…so holder HAS to be involved and so far, no one has even thought to question him about Benghazi.
The WHY of the vid was to be able to claim that Israel was responsible for the planned attack on Benghazi which they knew was coming on September 11 to avenge the death of ya ya al libi which they had NO INTENTION of stopping.
They knew the word was out to hit Stevens long in advance and aquiesced to it because that is the way they have done business with al qaeda for years. WE hit a ‘high value’ target, and we give them one back. Does ANYONE still believe that the downed Chinook with 20 Navy SEALs on board was just a routine taliban attack?
But this time, they also had other fish to fry and david petraeus is nothing if not a fantastical fish fryer. How do you think he got to be head of the CIA in the first place?
The gunrunning out of Benghazi was his op in collusion with brennan, obama, and clinton. They were NOT simply running guns to Syria, Many of those weapons were being diverted through Turkey to the muslim brotherhood in Egypt and being smuggled across the Rafah Crossing into Gaza for use against Israel…and Israel was beginning to expose it.
THIS time they could set this up to blame Israel, make Netanyahu VERY unpopular here in the US, cost him his election, and possibly facillitate an actual all out attack on Israel by an al qaeda/mb backed army which would have cost Israel dearly in blood and treasure.
So they brought in their trusted thug at DOJ and the plan was hatched well in advance. What is worse is that it would have worked if everything had gone exactly as planned.But it didn’t.
There would have been NO witnesses left alive. It would have been a complete slaughter had Ty Woods and Glen Doherty not disobeyed direct orders.
We would not be looking at cables sent begging for help. We would not know that help was not only denied on that terrible night, but that Stevens’ security had been reduced to nil. I believe he knew he was going to be sacrificed. It was pretty obvious. What he probably didn’t know was why.
There are ALWAYS variables you don’t foresee like the Cairo Embassy apologizing to protesters before there were any, and this op had plenty more of them.
Snafu one- Woods and Doherty.
Snafu two- CNN found Chris Stevens’ diary in the burnt out shell before the CIA or FBI got there.
Snafu three- AP found the video maker.
Snafu four- They decided to RUN with the original script that it was the video that caused the uprisings, but they changed it to reflect that Nakoula was a protesting Coptic Christian from Egypt.
Snafu five- Once AP found the guy, Walid Shoebat found out that his partner in crime was none other than Shoebat’s own first cousin…a pa terrorist…and that Nakoula was an FBI asset.
NOW look back and recall that obama had just previously started an international argument with Netanyahu which swept the front pages of every major news outlet in the world. A deliberate snub of Netanyahu for a meeting at the UN. And yet on the very night of September 11, in the MIDDLE of the attack in Benghazi, obama calls Netanyahu and talks for an hour, unaware that the SEALs had screwed his plan. Had the op gone as planned. the morning headlines would have had Israel in their crosshairs and obama could then say he was arguing or angry with Netanyahu and THAT was the reason for the irrelevant phone call during the heat of the battle in Benghazi.
obama went to bed that night thinking about, and probably rehearsing for, his news conference about the slaughter of 41 Americans because of Israel’s recklessness putting Americans in danger all over the world.
obama went to bed that night without issuing any orders whatsoever and made himself unreachable. Anyone who WANTED to do something, couldn’t. The ONLY person who could have nade a difference that night was obama…and he was AWOL.
obama went to bed that night without a care in the world…and when he woke up, hell was breaking loose. So what did he do? He followed his campaign schedule because he hadn’t a clue what had happened.
After they found out what had gone wrong, they stubbornly stuck to the script, proof or no proof, to give obama his day in the sun at the UN. Worse, he and clinton tried to deliberately provoke even more muslim violence to blame on the video by making a commercial ostensibly for Pakistan, but shown around the world apologizing for it where no one ever heard of it.
Well, he couldn’t attack Israel. He couldn’t blame Netanyahu. But he could still GLORIFY ISLAM at the UN and they kept the video story alive until he completed that task by announcing, and I quote, “The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.”
This might be one of the most evil speeches I have ever seen in my lifetime.
So now you know why the video and why AP. And I will end here because DOT TWO will be coming ASAP.
You can read the original article and all the responses including further information that might be of interest to you by clicking the link at the top of this post. The link will take you to FREE REPUBLIC and you just might like to stay awhile.
To my knowledge, there has not been a single confirmation from doj that the AP wiretaps had anything whatsoever to do with Yemen, yet that is all the media talks about and repeats it incessantly.
If anybody can show me anything that confirms the Yemen story, please alert me.
In the meantime, all we have is media speculation. For instance:
“Holder repeatedly pleaded ignorance about the wiretapping of AP editors and reporters, saying he had recused himself from what was evidently an investigation about a CIA counter-terrorism operation in Yemen last year.”
Please note that the above paraphrase was from holder’s own sworn testimony before Congress. NOWHERE did holder mention either a timeline or a REASON for the wiretaps, and yet the author of the article saw fit to include “evidently”. WHY was it evident when no one from doj has ever mentioned it?